Leigh Douglas Memorial Prize

Submissions for this prize are currently closed.

About the Prize

This prize was established jointly in 1986 by the Leigh Douglas Memorial Fund and BRISMES in memory of Dr Leigh Douglas who was killed in Beirut in 1986.  The prize is awarded annually to the writer of the best PhD dissertation on a Middle Eastern topic in the Social Sciences or Humanities awarded by a British University in the previous year. The current value of the prize is £600 for the winner and £250 for the runner up.

Please note that the annual deadline for the prize has changed to allow the winner to attend the BRISMES annual conference.


Any student who has submitted their PhD dissertation on a Middle Eastern topic in the Social Sciences or Humanities to a British University between 1 January and 30 September 2023 is eligible to apply. If you are submitting your thesis after the deadline in 2023, you will be eligible for the following year’s prize.

We recommend that submissions for this prize are made after completion of your viva in order to benefit from feedback from the viva panel, but applicants can make a submission before the viva if they wish. Please note that you can only submit your PhD dissertation once for this prize.

How to Apply 

To enter, please send the following to office@brismes.org:

  • An electronic copy of your thesis
  • A letter of nomination from your supervisor

Deadline: Midnight on 15 November 2023

Entering your thesis for this award does not preclude entering it for other awards.

2023 Joint Winners (£300 each)

Suhad Bishara (King's College London)

Land and Law in Palestine/Israel: Settler Colonial Perspective on Jewish Territorial Domination

Suhad Bishara’s thesis investigates the structures of colonial legalities in Palestine/Israel, on both sides of the Green Line. This is a first study of the legal infrastructure of the Zionist settler colonial project in Palestine as a whole, challenging the dichotomy that prevails in the existing literature that offers an analysis of the Israeli legal system on either 48’ Palestine or the OPT as two separate systems/entities. Her study weaves together existing literature of the Israeli legal system and is underpinned by rich empirical evidence from Supreme Court judgements and legislation as well as new archival material, covering the period from 1948 and until today, to offer a rigorous analysis of the consistent racial logic that guides the legal system around questions of land and territoriality since the state’s establishment. The decision to deal with the Supreme Court judgments is vital: the Supreme Court prides itself to be the guardian of Israel’s ‘democracy’ (both internally and internationally) and as an institution that provides legal recourse to address injustices suffered by Palestinians in the OPT. Here, Bishara skilfully reveals its role as fundamental tool for ensuring racially-defined Jewish territoriality (and supremacy) on both sides of the Green Line, tracing adaptation and implementation of legal technologies on different Palestinian communities through space and time, amounting for the continuities and similarities that exist in policies and practices in the OPT and within ‘Green Line Israel’. Bishara’s analysis contributes to settler colonial theory, tracing the racial logic of elimination in both its ‘negative’ and ‘positive’ aspects, and the way in which they both materialise through the law/legal system, to simultaneously replace and displace Palestinians, and construct and sustain a Jewish collectivity, as particularly manifested in the possession of Jewish-controlled land (and rights over it), which is found at the heart of the settler colonial project. While being empirically rich, the thesis is written in an accessible language to non-legal experts. I believe she is more than deserving to be awarded the Leigh Douglas Dissertation Prize.

Maia Holtermann Entwistle (SOAS University of London)

Fuelling Culture: Art, Race, and Capitalism on the Arabian Peninsula

Maia Entwistle’s PhD thesis about how racial capitalism and empire have enabled the creation of the UAE’s cultural infrastructure in the Arabian Gulf is a timely, urgent and much-need intervention into the study of the politics, cultures and societies of the Middle East. In particular, the thesis contributes to the study of the cultural politics that shape museum practices and contemporary arts production in the region, a field of study and practice which has grown immensely since the turn of the millennium. In recent years scholars of the region have produced a series of compelling studies on the cultural and artistic production of postcolonial nationalist cultures focused on identities, trauma, memory-making, and other forms of non-essentialist cultural practices. Loosely located in this critical body of work that reads politics from the vantage point of art and culture, Entwistle’s thesis goes a step further. It expands the conceptual and theoretical research net outwards beyond the local and the national (even while also carefully considering them) to uncover the complex of economic and racial forces at play that shape the infrastructure of an art and culture scene that has hitherto been regarded as libationary and essential in the literature and the popular imagination because of the relative dearth in globalized, heftily funded and grandiose platforms for art circulation in the region.

Yet, Entwistle’s thesis painstakingly demonstrates how building this high culture infrastructure is bound up with the logic of the market capitalism that defines global racial capitalist economies. In this framework of analysis Entwistle reveals how the notions of identity, indigeneity and decolonization-hallmarks of progressive politics in academia and the arts are in the case of the Gulf ironically employed to further a racialized and hierarchal capitalist economy of extraction. Here Entwistle’s focus on labour, both intellectual and material, as well as technologies is novel and indeed an exciting contribution to thinking around the politics of cultural production in the Gulf. It brings art and culture to the study of the global economies of labour in the Middle East while at the same time breaking with the celebratory approach in scholarly work on the Gulf that has read the infrastructure build-up as either a typical example of global identity and nation-building or as a decolonial answer to western art hegemonies. Methodologically, conceptually and theoretically Entwistle’s contribution is sensitively and intricately executed and relayed in her weighed analysis. Throughout Entwistle is respectful of her research subjects while showing delicately and with intricate detail just how art and racial capitalism are bound up in the Gulf, as elsewhere in the world. I recommend this outstanding thesis for an award without any reservations.

2023 Joint Runners Up (£125 each)

Hashem Abushama (Hertford College, University of Oxford)

Articulations: Settler Colonialism, Dispossession, and Arts in post-Oslo Palestine

Dr. Abushama’s dissertation provides an outstanding and original contribution to the understanding of the neoliberal settler colonial order in post-Oslo Palestine and how it affects cultural life. Situating itself at the intersection of urban theory and cultural studies, while displaying an impressive in-depth knowledge of the cultural-political history of Palestine, the dissertation soundly demonstrates how settler colonialism and capitalism dispossess and transform indigenous geographies and urban cultures. From the artist colony of ‘Ayn Hawd, through the gentrified spaces of Haifa, to the Ramallah neoliberal bantustan, the author carefully shows how the combination of Israeli settler colonialism and capitalism translates into multiple terrains of erasure, control, and management that contemporary Palestinian cultural production has to navigate and articulate through. In this context, the author concludes that the politics of boycotts across different areas of historic Palestine constitute a socio-spatial practice that allows to critically interrogate the legitimacy of the neoliberal settler colonial order and shape spaces in which this order can be resisted. Carefully researched, but also legantly and sophisticatedly written, this dissertation deserves to be published and discussed across different disciplines and cultural-intellectual fora.

Razan Ghazzawi (University of Sussex)

Pedagogies of Everyday Queer Protests: Rethinking Political Subjectivity and Political Violence in the Syrian and Lebanon 2011-2022

Razan’s thesis is incredibly unique, they have woven together their own experience of protest, conflict, and survival with political theory and the stories of others. They have taken great care in making an important argument about the heteronormative logics behind the categorisation of revolutionary and non-revolutionary figures, and how these logics exclude queer figures, including anti-military feminists, sex workers, and anti-military minorities. Razan examines the latter group, drawing from personal experience and interviews with effected individuals, and makes visible the histories and experiences of individuals who are often excluded from history. Razan’s writing is clear and digestible, while engaged in layers of complexity,  they take the time and space to explain concepts and theories, providing the reader with a solid foundation to engage with the thesis. There is a strong contribution to the field of studies on revolution, queer politics, and Middle East Studies.

2023 Honourable Mention (£100 book token)

Elizabeth Marteijn (University of Edinburgh)

Between Ruins and Remnants: Religious Reinvention and Renewal among Palestinian Christians in West Bank Palestine

Elizabeth Marteijn’s PhD on Palestinian Christianity identifies social, political and religious questions concurrently. She does not interpret Palestinian Christianity simply as a social science; rather, she gives equal weight to various aspects of religious practice and the biblical text together with social and anthropological considerations, coming out of her own field work. This methodology, in my view, is to be commended and deserves to be supported. In line with the claim that truth is constituted by story and experience, Marteijn’s thesis takes seriously the idea that Palestinian Christianity is best seen as a set of interpretive resources and practices that is, unlike what is often claimed, far more significant for the broader good of Palestinian society. Her anthropology begins with how individuals and communities grapple with the Christian resources in context and shape their practices in meaningful ways. In this way, she looks at how people draw on textual traditions to inform social practices. This allows her to develop a couple of analytical strategies. First, she engages with what could be called intentions, understandings and emptions surrounding specific practices such as saint veneration and national identity, biblical text, and ancient belonging. Second, she relates her research to contemporary political developments in Palestine and the significance of the Palestinian Christian community in that society. One need not labour the point about the ancient roots of Christianity in Palestine. But it is worth exploring a bit about the role that they have played in various contexts in the Middle East. The thesis tried to create greater and renewed awareness of that Christian presence. She spells out how Palestinian Christianity has been a broker of cultural goods within the wider society, keeping alive certain sorts of intellectual understanding and challenging political narratives. The author does not ignore texts here, but is interested in how people see these texts, not simply how they have been read in traditional scholarly debates. There is a good deal of freshness in this, full of insights and originality.

2022 Joint Winners (£300 each)

Nader Andrawos

Righting Dissent: Intellectual Critique and Human Rights in Egypt

This dissertation is a highly original and intellectually ambitious work. First, Andrawos examines multiple practices of clinical work, lawyering and intellectual debating to revisit the historical unfolding, and different manifestations, of the question of Human Rights in Egypt. Second, his multi-pronged historical reconstruction becomes the ground from which he distills a “neo-republican” political theory which seeks to develop an alternative to liberal theories which put the autonomous individual subject at their center and their communitarian critics. In making his argument Andrawos impressively weaves together multiple historical, political, conceptual and sociological threads.  In addition to developing a historically and sociologically grounded political theory, this dissertation interventions on multiple fronts. It makes a compelling case for looking at Egyptian rights-work as growing out of radical emancipatory traditions such as Feminism and Marxism. This grounded history of the singular trajectory of Egyptian human rights enables him to call into question smooth narratives of global transition that conceptualize rights-work as that which breaks away from, and comes after, the radical militancy of the 1960s. Also, by revisiting the decades of rights militancy before the Arab revolutions (2011-), it also provides a rich pre-history that complicates reading the Egyptian revolution as erupting ex-nihilo. Last but not least, this is the work of a scholar whose intellectual virtuosity and inter-disciplinary competence are matched by a commitment to a deep understanding of the intellectual and political stakes of the work of generations of militants, lawyers and clinicians. 

Nora Jaber 

Women, International Law, and the State: A Critical Analysis of Saudi Women’s Petitions for Reform 
(Dickson Poon School of Law, King’s College London)

This is an excellent inter-disciplinary thesis on the local and global engagement with Public International Law and International Human Rights. It is a study of Saudi women’s activism using meticulous analysis of women’s petitions over several decades. Theoretically, the thesis builds on a body of literature on the general topics and the specific case study. The author shows impressive critical ability to review and engage with previous literature on the history of the country, social scientific approaches on the gender question, and feminist contributions to the study of the state. Methodologically, while the author was restrained by various restrictions on independent research on topics deemed ‘sensitive’, she devised new mixed-method methodological strategies to overcome serious obstacles, such as engaging with various primary and secondary sources and conducting a critical discourse analysis of state discourse, international legal discourse, and petitions. The outcome is a superb treatise on international law and feminist activism in a highly restrictive context. The thesis develops new arguments and makes substantial contributions to studying how activists address both local and global audiences to strengthen their advocacy for greater rights. Her analysis of several petitions and other forms of advocacy invokes the strategy of the intersection between, what she labels, local and global-facing activism. She shows that, in addressing local audiences, Saudi women shift the focus to more local nuanced normative and justice frameworks that resonate with their local context. While activists are aware of international human rights norms, they largely ground their claims in local frames of reference and in Islamic law, especially interpretations that promote women’s rights from within the Islamic tradition. The thesis makes valuable contribution to understanding women’s activism in Saudi Arabia as she situates it in both the local and global contexts. It has implications for how the effects and utility of international law can be studied and understood in various non-Western contexts. The thesis should appeal to not only Saudi or Gulf specialists but those interested in the globalisation of human right discourses, the limitations of the ‘global regime of human rights’ and the appeal of ‘authentic solutions’ to forms of gender-based discrimination.

2022 Runner Up (£150)

Joshua Rigg

A Resounding No: Contentious Politics in Tunisia 2015-2019
(SOAS, University of London)

The thesis is about activists in post-2011 Tunisia, and it makes an important pitch for the work that refusal does, a refusal that is also an affirmation. This is the central paradox around which the thesis is constructed. Drawing on Rosa Luxemburg, Michel Foucault, and Antonio Negri among others, the thesis explores the ‘resounding no’ as in some sense politically constitutive, where ‘the state is refused rather than captured’. It focuses on the work of Tunisian activists who were engaged in ‘a ceaseless movement as they sought to refuse any single, fixed definition of the limits and end-goal to resistance after the revolution’. Their refusals were part of this constitutive power, a refusal of the state, a rejection of the hegemony of liberal transition, a refusal which re-defined the boundaries of the political. The thesis has many strengths. It is clearly a contribution to knowledge at the appropriate level; it masters an important and wide-ranging scholarly conversation; it is based on a substantial period of fieldwork; it draws on an appropriate, well-justified, and clearly articulated methodology; it is consistently well-argued and well-written, exposing a rich seam of fieldwork and drawing on direct evidence with considerable skill, clarity and insight; it is clearly structured; it makes a distinctive argument about the importance of political refusal in post-2011 Tunisia, reading this ‘resounding “no”’ from diverse activist sectors to ‘liberal transition’ as not only negative and destructive, but also as positive and constitutive of alternative forms of horizontalist politics. The thesis enjoys an overall coherence of purpose, and reveals a sophisticated and in-depth understanding of the issues at stake in this debate. It shows a high degree of reflexivity and conceptual precision. The thesis is publishable, or will be publishable, depending on how the candidate wants to deploy the material, in whole or in part. It makes a vital contribution to ongoing debates about popular struggle and contentious mobilization in the contemporary Middle East, and sets the candidate up for a promising academic career.

2022 Honourable Mention (£75 book token)

Dena Qaddumi

Post-Arab Spring Tunis: Materializing Revolution in the City
(University of Cambridge)

The thesis is wonderfully and competently written, it is lucid, and erudite. The thesis also stands on a wealth of empirical knowledge of the city of Tunis, rarely allowed to take space in English-speaking literature on architecture, urban space and geography or even politics. As such, the thesis narrates a crucial story about how revolutionary processes materialise in the city, precisely in the absence of grand political gestures in urban space. As such, on my reading the thesis fundamentally challenges a western political fixation on the tragic and spectacular in addressing urban space in the Middle East. I think the thesis’ original contribution to knowledge centres primarily on A) the decision to focus on Tunis, Tunisia in the shy of a decade after the Arab-Spring, and I hardly think we have seen good comprehensive volumes on the city of Tunis as opposed to other sites in the MENA region; and B) the decision to approach the city relationally, dwelling on ambivalences of symbolism, signification and appropriation amongst the regime, the state, governing bodies and “the people”. This somehow disinvests from single-sited studies, or surface engagements with sites and events that are easily legible for a Western audience.  I also think there is a lot of potential in the theoretical propositions advanced, including thinking about what a revolutionary city is (what does the term, concept entail), and what are the future implication of the designation of the Arab City (deftly explored through contested and multi-layered cultural significations in three core sites, constituting the three case studies). I wish to thank the committee for letting me read this insightful thesis, and I hope to see it very soon published as a book.

2021 Joint Winners (£300 each)

Hannah Elsisi Ashmawi

Mu'taqal Machine: Power, Gender and Identity in Egypt’s Political Prisons, 1948-1981
(Merton College, University of Oxford)

This is a very impressive thesis that makes a novel contribution to the field of Middle East studies in a number of ways. First, the thesis is based on a huge wealth of primary materials in Arabic, English, Italian and French, which includes private and public archives, published and unpublished audio of interviews, some 100 original interviews and published memoirs. The thesis also contains various images, such as layouts of prisons and letters written by political prisoners on cigarette papers. In this regard, the thesis constitutes a unique archive of the lives of political prisoners in Egypt, (re-)presenting their stories and sacrifices and ensuring that their names are written into the country’s history. Second, the thesis fills an important gap in the study of the Middle East through a focus on the prison machine, its history and development, deepening our understanding of the prison as a mechanism of governance in contemporary Egypt. Third, the thesis develops an original argument about the significance of gender in structuring the power of the prison and shaping prisoner subjectivities and resistance to the prison machine. Specifically, the thesis demonstrates how prison authorities sought to demoralise and ‘deactivate’ political prisoners by undermining their gender identities and, in turn, political prisoners reconstituted themselves, in particular by differentiating themselves from ‘ordinary criminals’, through the reassertion of particular gender identities of female respectability and manhood. The thesis also demonstrates how the gendered power of the prison extends beyond the prison walls and is also exercised and resisted in relation to prisoner families. Overall, this is an extremely rich piece of work. It is beautifully written and a joy to read. This will undoubtedly become a key reference in the study of political prisoners in the Middle East.

Mattin Biglari 

Refining Knowledge: Expertise, Labour and Everyday Life in the Iranian Oil Industry, c.1933-51
(SOAS University of London)

This is a truly outstanding piece of research. Its theoretical sophistication is far beyond that customarily encountered in PhD theses and shows not only an understanding of, but an active and confident engagement with recent trends in the history and historiography of modern Iran, of the oil industry in the Middle East and of the rapidly expanding field of Energy Humanities. Particularly welcome is its successful integration of subaltern actors into its analysis, giving full recognition to their roles in an area dominated by state-centred paradigms. It is entirely convincing in its reading of the oil nationalization in Iran in 1951 as a turning point not only for Iran and the wider Middle East but for the history of decolonisation across the Global South. The thesis makes use of a range of material either unused or under-used to date, archival material from Iran, the UK and US, and oral histories, memoirs and newspapers. The bibliography and footnotes demonstrate the astonishing range of secondary sources consulted. The thesis is beautifully written, the clarity of exposition is first class, jargon is avoided and the organization of the material assists the reader to a degree rare in unpublished work. This thesis is undoubtedly a major contribution to the fields it addresses. We have nothing in studies of the Iranian oil industry which approaches it in terms of originality, of theoretical depth and solid empirical research.

2021 Runner Up (£150)

Valentina Zagaria

'Burning’ borders: Migration, death and dignity in a Tunisian coastal town
(London School of Economics and Political Science)

This is an extremely original and well-grounded PhD dissertation, that demonstrates in-depth empirical research and that advances a key theoretical argument about the centrality of dignity in Tunisians’ migrations in the aftermath of the Tunisian revolution. The work develops a highly nuanced analysis of the political and social Tunisian context. Overall, the dissertation provides a very original insight about the nexus between migration movements and revolutionary uprisings. The work is fluently written and rigorously structured. It also unsettles taken-for-granted timeframes of the Tunisian revolution as well as of migrations to Italy by focusing on key events that happened in the city of Zarzis. This work brings a salient contribution to migration studies literature, by illustrating how dignity and social death play a crucial role in migration.

Honourable Mention (£75 book token)

Haya Al-Noaimi

The ‘Protectors of our Nation’: constructing masculinities between protection and in/security in Qatar and the UAE
(SOAS University of London)

This is a very strong dissertation that expounds a lucid and compelling argument about the gendered nature of conscription in Qatar and the UAE. It is beautifully written and manages to contribute to a host of literatures including feminist work, scholarship on masculinities, and the rather broad field of security studies. Through interviews and archival work, the thesis sets out to explore five interconnected logics of ‘protection’. It is successful in delineating these logics, as well as demonstrating the ways in which colonial violence has afterlives in the form of postcolonial security arrangements. The dissertation also evinces a sophisticated and self-reflective approach by laying out the difficulties in, and limits of, research methods including archival work, participant-observation, and discourse analysis. As such, it situates the author as a subject in the dissertation leading to a very mature and thought-provoking set of conclusions about the nature of research. Finally, and perhaps most tellingly, the focus on ‘Gulf masculinities’ is both highly original and full of insight. By looking at an oft-neglected field of study – accounts of ‘gender’ in the Middle East are overwhelmingly concerned with Muslim women, and less often dedicated to masculinity in non-Gulf Arab countries – this thesis makes a convincing case for analysing how local experiences of ‘security’ and ‘protection’ stemming from violent state building endeavours are inextricable from colonial constructions of military masculinities. The final chapter makes an especially strong argument about how the Bedouin were made insecure by their incorporation into the colonial lexicon of ‘martial races’. In sum, this is an impressive and erudite thesis that makes a significant contribution to the field of International Relations (broadly understood) by highlighting the nexus between colonial and local instantiations of insecure masculinities in Qatar and the Emirates.

2020 Winner (£600)

Ayşe Arslan

Industrial Workers in the Garment Industry, House-Workers in the Family: Women's Productive and Reproductive Labour in Izmir, Turkey
(SOAS University of London)

This thesis is of very high quality not only in terms of the originality of its argument but also the strength of the empirical research used to back it up. Theoretically it combines E. P. Thompson’s approach to class formation with a Marxist-feminist approach to women’s reproductive labour. In doing this, Ayşe Arslan contributes to the literature through innovative concepts of her own, such as ‘women’s reserve army of reproductive labour’, referring to the role of women relatives and friends of working women in reducing the women workers’ reproductive obligations by undertaking some of their responsibilities without pay. The thesis is also based on a rigorous research which combines an ethnographic extended case study with quantitative data and secondary sources. It fills an important gap in the literature on the relationship between class and gender in the Middle East through a systematic study of how the industrial and reproductive work of women workers shape each other in the garment industry in Turkey. The thesis also provides insights on the factors that might enhance the formation of solidarity rather than competition among women workers, a crucial intellectual-political question for socialist feminists struggling against the double threat of neoliberalism and conservatism in the Middle East.

2020 Runner-up (£150)

Adélie Chevée

The Emergence of Syrian Grassroots Intellectuals: Critique and Political Commitment in the Revolutionary Press (2011-2017)
(SOAS University of London)

Adélie Chevée’s study about the emergence of grassroots intellectuals in the Syrian revolution is a creative and insightful. She compares the post-2011 generation of intellectuals to the one that dominated the socio-political scene before the revolution. The study is important in more than one way. It provides innovative tools to explore knowledge production in the context of the Syrian revolt. It sheds light on intellectuals who have an ability to communicate effectively through revolutionary media and who were able to build cultural (and revolutionary) capital through grassroots activism. Chevée proposes an original framework combining Gramscian and Bourdieusian theories to explore the role of the intellectual in revolutionary Syria. On the one hand, she proposes a sophisticated framework that builds on an extensive literature about traditional and organic intellectuals during political crises. On the other hand, she engages with Arab and Syrian scholarship about the role of critical intellectuals since 2011. This allows the author to formulate a solid critique of Western knowledge production about the region. Chevée debunks popular Orientalist tropes about cultures in the Middle East and the Arab regions. Finally, Chevée conducted interviews with key grassroots intellectuals in Beirut, Gaziantep, and Istanbul. This multi-sited study provides a nuanced account of the cultural field in Syria and the diaspora since 2011. It explains the tensions between older and newer generations of intellectuals and the evolution of the cultural field in the past decade. Ultimately, the study makes important contributions in several fields, including studies of nationalism in the Levant; knowledge production in the MENA region; as well as the history of the cultural sphere in Syria.

2020 Honourable Mention (£75 book token)

Simon Leese

Longing for Salmá and Hind: (Re)producing Arabic Literature in 18th and 19th-Century North India
(SOAS University of London)

This is an impressive piece of work, which takes as its subject an under-researched and almost wholly unexplored field that will almost certainly attract further attention as a result of Simon Leese’s preliminary explorations. It focuses on what Leese characterises as an ‘Arabic moment’ in the multi-lingual intellectual history of 18th- and 19th-century North India and investigates how Muslim poets and scholars in the area engaged with aspects of the Arabic literary heritage, moving between the ‘three languages’ (Arabic, Persian and Urdu) while careful to keep what he terms the ‘poetic terrains’ of those languages distinct. Much of the thesis is based on newly unearthed sources, which promise to provide material for much future research in this area.

The topic of the thesis clearly requires a knowledge of the languages involved that goes well beyond that of most PhD students but Leese demonstrates that he is well equipped for the task and it is hard to fault the detailed literary and textual analyses that make up a considerable proportion of the thesis. Leese’s argument that Arabic scholars in India during this period had a rich historical and geographical awareness is a cogent one, and seems certain to suggest possibilities for re-reading Arabic’s other multilingual pasts and multilingual poetics more generally. Not the least of the other merits of the thesis is that, despite the linguistic complexity of much of the material being discussed, it reads easily and is impeccably presented. All in all, this thesis not only makes a fascinating read for anyone interested in the literary and cultural history of the region, but also makes a highly significant contribution to the field of study.

2019 Joint Winners (£300 each)

Veronica Ferreri

A State of Permanent Loss. War and Displacement in Syria and Lebanon

This thesis chronicles the trajectory of displacement of a Syrian community from al-Qusayr and its countryside to Lebanon. Based on thirteen months of ethnographic fieldwork, including participant observation, semi-structured interviews and the collection of oral histories, the work dissects Qusayris’ tasharrud, a term used by the community to define its own displacement and war. Veronica Ferreri has produced an outstanding piece of research, brilliantly laid out and evocatively drawing the reader into a compassionate understanding of the terrible loss which Syrians face in their displacement in Lebanon not only since 2011 but sometimes commencing decades earlier. Ferreri’s study is both original and persuasive. The redefinition of the term tasharrud as a state of permanent loss rather than the dictionary definition of homelessness, or vagabondage was both original and deeply convincing. The originality of this work lay in the manner in which Ferreri peeled back the meaning of tasharrud to show that is was a three-fold loss: loss of physical space; loss of social status; and loss of official documents. Ferreri’s clarity of exposition was faultless and she wrote with a warmth and approachability that gave the study great moral depth. The use of quotations was beautifully integrated into the discussions, supporting the analysis and not appearing as ‘anecdotal’ statements. Overall this manuscript makes a significant contrition to the field setting out the complexity first of the difficulty in distinguishing between forced and voluntary migration, and secondly in unpacking the significance of loss – as physical displacement, loss of social status as mutasharriduun, and what is so often overlooked, loss of legal documentations attesting to one’s citizenship, ownership, education, and other aspects of social and political belonging.

Shiva Mihan

Timurid Manuscript Production: The Scholarship and Aesthetics of Prince Bāysunghur’s Royal Atelier (1420-1435)
(University of Cambridge)

Shiva Mihan’s thesis puts the study of classical Persian painting in its early 15th-century golden age on an entirely new footing. The thesis is beautifully laid out and very well structured and is simply magisterial and mature beyond the years of its author. Its scholarship is profound, wide-ranging and all-encompassing, and that scholarship is the bedrock of the entire – and boldly ambitious – text itself. That text is, so to speak, the visible tip of the iceberg. The bulk of the iceberg, in other words the raw data which provides the basis for some 275 pages of closely-focused discussion, comprises a further 117 pages. Mihan meticulously examines and analyses the the physical state of these manuscripts: bindings, doublures, frontispieces, carpet pages, shamsas, ‘unwans, colophons, illumination, paper, calligraphy, seals, signatures and inscriptions. In other words, codicology in its fullest sense. No earlier scholar has come close to this breadth and depth of solid information for any period of Persian painting; a huge achievement, and a challenge for all future scholars. This is not to say that Mihan avoids speculation – she knows the scholarly literature, both Western and Persian, inside out, and has her own theories about it – for example, she takes issue very convincingly with the purpose of these manuscripts, the role of the patron, the detailed workings of his atelier, the intended audience of these manuscripts, their meaning, their distinctive style and why they developed it. Altogether, this as an absolutely outstanding thesis which is ready for publication more or less as it stands.

2019 Joint Runners Up (£150 each)

Dena Fakhro

The Blood Vengeance Theme in Arabic Poetry: From the Classical Poetic Tradition to the Present

This is an extremely impressive and mature piece of work for a PhD thesis in which Dena Fakhro examines the theme of blood vengeance in Arabic poetry over fifteen hundred years. The range of primary material under consideration, the coherence of arguments, and use of the relevant secondary literature are all outstanding. Three things stand out as particularly impressive in this work. The first is the way in which, in addition to literary sources, the Dena Fakhro successfully navigates her way through material rooted in a number of different disciplines, of which anthropology is clearly the most important. The second is how Fakhro has succeeded in constructing from this astonishing range of material a narrative that is not only plausible and coherent but is also a pleasure to read, being marked by an uncommon clarity of expression as well as an almost complete absence of the typos, transliteration errors and other infelicities that mar many PhD theses. The third, and perhaps most important, is that she has succeeded in bringing classical Arabic poetry — a field that many would regard as somewhat esoteric and arcane — out of the shadows and demonstrated its relevance to the study of movements in the contemporary Islamic world that are of urgent concern to an audience that extends far beyond academics.

Lewis Turner

Challenging Refugee Men: Humanitarianism and Masculinities in Za‘tari Refugee Camp

Lewis Turner’s thesis investigates the ways in which the humanitarian sector deals with Syrian refugee men in the context of Za’tari refugee camp in Jordan, arguing that refugee men present a challenge to the gendered and racialized logics of the humanitarian sector as they fail to comply with notions of feminised victimhood. This thesis is based on a very impressive amount of fieldwork in Jordan, including visits to Za’tari camp, participant observations in relevant workshops and gatherings of humanitarian actors and interviews with humanitarian actors and Syrian refugees. The thesis is a wonderfully rich and closely observed piece of work that overflows with insights and provocations about and connections between the humanitarian sector, the securitization of refugees, the governance of refugee camps, the geopolitics of the Syrian conflict and of the ‘refugee crisis’, refugee agency, race and gender. It demonstrates how the construction of refugees within humanitarianism as passive and vulnerable shapes how humanitarian actors deal with refugee men as either problematic or invisible and how, in turn, this impacts upon refugee men in the specific case of Za’tari camp. This is the first study that I have come across that addresses the situation of refugee men and makes an original contribution to our understanding of humanitarian responses to refugees by carefully analysing the ways in which humanitarian policies are informed by gendered and racialized assumptions about refugees and how, in turn, this impacts upon male recipients of humanitarian responses. Moreover, this thesis makes an important contribution to how we understand humanitarianism in the context of conflict and displacement in the Middle East, marking a critical turn in which humanitarianism is viewed not as a solution to suffering and indignity but rather as complicit with forces of oppression, violence and injustice.

2019 Honourable Mention (£75 book token)

Gizem Tongo

Ottoman Painting and Painters during the First World War
(University of Oxford)

This study focuses on the Ottoman art world during the First World War and explores how the war changed the conditions of art production, its agents, and the art itself between 1914 and 1918, a topic that has remained peripheral to international cultural histories of the First World War and modern art more generally. This is an excellent thesis. Its subject is a tightly focussed study about art, art institutions and artists during the period of the First World War. Set against the political backdrop of the last half century of the Ottoman Empire, with a concise and highly readable narrative it explores, within a clear chronological framework, the institutions, the key actors, and topics such as the relationship with western painting, how art was brought into the service of the state, the fate of Armenian artists as a result of the genocide, how the arts in fact benefited during the war and much else. Well illustrated, and with an extensive use of source material, this is an extremely rich story that has been largely overlooked. While focussing on art production in all its forms from academic painting to propagandist posters, it touches also in major on social history and the place of art in society. There has been some literature on this subject, but nowhere near as detailed and multi-facetted as this. In my view, this is a highly original contribution to scholarship.

Database of Expertise

The Database of Expertise in Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies provides a publicly available list of MENA experts with their research and areas of expertise.

Search Now